 |
 |
|
                    

08 September 2008, Cervera de los Montes
Last week, before my work was printed in all Korean newspapers, Il-kwon asked me to write a text explaining the contents of the work - this text would have been attached on the wall next to my work. I sent the text to Raúl but I don't know what happened to it. My work We Love Samsung and Kim-Il Sung is not about Koreans but more about myself, a foreigner who knows only few things about Korea. Undoubtedly, those two names are the best known things of the country divided by the last border of the cold war. The first is South Korea's largest company and the world's second largest conglomerate by revenue leading several industries in the world. The latter was North Korea’s “Great Leader” who established an extensive personality cult. Both are perfect examples of branding. Anything from political parties via popcorn to plasma screens can be branded, marketed, imported and exported. Even the politicians don’t see any difference in working for people, political parties or companies. For example, Gerhard Schröder was the chanchellor of Germany and Paavo Lipponen was the prime minister of Finland - now both of them work for the Russian Gazprom, the largest extractor of natural gas in the world, Samsung’s counterpart. In the Garden of Delights exhibition both Kim Il-sung and Samsung represent utopias: A communist dream that turned out to be a famine and a global neoliberalist dream come true that might turn out to a distopia, too. If the installation were somewhere else than in Korea, Samsung could be changed to any super conglomerate and Kim Il-sung to any omnipotent leader but I really loved the sung sung rhyme.
                

04 September 2008, Cervera de los Montes
It seems that my work is a headline in all South Korean newspapers and internet portals. Most of them have used the information and pictures from the Associated Pres. I collected some headlines and fragments automatically translated by Google. Kim Il-sung mural controversy, the conclusion can not be punished. (...) breeds controversy but the National Security Law sang punishment was impossible determine. (...)jeopardizing stability(...). Yeosu official said that the mural contains the transfer of the pro-communist(...). Controversy is rising. But it is difficult to determine that the penalties apply to the National Security Law. (...) stabilize the country's existence is recognized, because they are not unintentionally jeopardize the National Security Law can not be punished a starting point. The problem is that some people work for the visitors praise North was abandoned, while he strongly protested. National Security Law requirements are meant to punish. Not even a simple list of achievements of Kim Il-sung as a work of art should be evaluated. National Intelligence Service and Inspector hold (...) the problem was framed (...) to take measures (...). Words Yeosu police staition, National Security Law, jeopardizing the safety or free democratic basic order. (...) representation is going into a fight. (...) some social groups are strongly opposed and protested (...).
And somebody defends me, too: Art is art, the art itself to be interpreted as a possesion to do it shall be respected. This must be Il-kwon, our host, proffesor at the Chonnam National University. In another newspaper he says: Is truly a work of art, notice that you want to express a level of cultural awareness missed it.
            

03 September 2008, Cervera de los Montes
I woke up very early for the jet lag but I like to see the sunrise and do my things when my wife and daughter are sleeping. I’m wearing Hotel Bellagio’s bathrobe I stole in and my mind and my body are still partly in Yeosu. I got some news from Raúl about the mess with my work. Il-kwon e-mailed him today that the trouble with the authorities continues. This is what Raúl replied to him:
Try to get them to censor the work, to take it out down, or paint over the text that says Kim Il Sung. We can use this for publicity, and draw attention to Riiko and the show. Say, if you do not like the art piece with the text, take it down; it's a chess game, and we are better players. Do this very tactically; let them think that they are only censoring Riiko's work, then I'll come down and pull the whole show. We can one-up all the biennials in Korea right now with this move, I have friends in Korean press and they are just looking for something like this to happen. That is why I have not sent anythin in defense of Riiko's work. Sure I could write a nice lengthy explanation, but antagonize them and have them censor. Now that the show has been documented with pictures, and we are not there, tell them the curator said if if the work bothers you, fuck you. Plus being co-curator of Media_City Seoul Biennial that opens one week form tomorrow, I'll be swamped with interviews; then I will defend Riiko's work.
|
 |
|
| |